
Who owns America's nursing homes, as disclosed to CMS
Every certified nursing home's own ownership filing (Form CMS-855A, via PECOS), joined to Care Compare, the CMS chain file and the change-of-ownership file for the August 2026 vintage. We count what facilities disclose; we never infer an owner they did not report.
- 65 facilities (0.44%) disclose a private-equity owner
- 577 (3.93%) disclose a REIT in any role
- 1,399 changed hands in 36 months
- Release v2026.08 · CMS August 2026 vintage
The headline numbers
Of 14,690 certified nursing homes in the release, 14,215 matched a PECOS enrollment whose ownership rows can be read. An owner holds an ownership or control role (direct or indirect ownership interest, partnership interest, operational or managerial control); a party is any other disclosable party, most often the landlord. The distinction is the whole story for REITs.
- Disclose a private-equity owner650.44% of facilities · 7,404 beds
- Private equity in any role970.66% · 32 among other parties only
- Disclose a REIT owner730.5% of facilities
- REIT in any role5773.93% · 61,235 beds · mostly landlords
- For-profit74%Care Compare ownership type
- In a CMS-identified chain68.9%Browse the chains
- Changed hands in 36 months1,3999.5% · PECOS change-of-ownership file
- Care Compare 12-month change flag1130.77% of facilities
By state
Pick a layer. Each one is a share of the state's certified nursing homes in release v2026.08; the table under the map carries every layer for every state.
For-profit share. Share of certified nursing homes whose ownership type in Care Compare is for-profit. CMS August 2026 vintage, release v2026.08. States with fewer than 10 facilities are left blank.
| Alaska | 20 | 30.0% | 35.0% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.0% | 0.00% | 20.0% | 3.5 |
| Alabama | 224 | 84.4% | 72.3% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 4.9% | 1.34% | 0.9% | 3.0 |
| Arkansas | 221 | 90.5% | 81.9% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.5% | 0.00% | 0.9% | 3.4 |
| Arizona | 140 | 85.7% | 80.0% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 10.7% | 0.71% | 0.7% | 3.3 |
| California | 1,165 | 87.0% | 72.1% | 0.34% | 1.29% | 5.9% | 1.03% | 2.9% | 3.2 |
| Colorado | 210 | 83.3% | 72.9% | 0.00% | 4.29% | 20.0% | 0.95% | 3.3% | 3.1 |
| Connecticut | 191 | 80.1% | 57.6% | 0.52% | 1.57% | 13.1% | 0.52% | 3.1% | 3.0 |
| District of Columbia | 17 | 41.2% | 11.8% | 0.00% | 17.65% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 5.9% | 3.4 |
| Delaware | 44 | 72.7% | 72.7% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 18.2% | 4.55% | 11.4% | 3.3 |
| Florida | 694 | 80.1% | 76.8% | 0.00% | 4.47% | 7.1% | 0.14% | 2.3% | 3.3 |
| Georgia | 356 | 69.4% | 68.5% | 0.00% | 3.37% | 10.1% | 0.28% | 1.7% | 2.6 |
| Guamsmall | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 3.0 |
| Hawaii | 43 | 60.5% | 48.8% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 3.6 |
| Iowa | 387 | 53.7% | 56.8% | 0.78% | 0.52% | 16.0% | 1.29% | 3.6% | 3.1 |
| Idaho | 80 | 81.3% | 80.0% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 3.1 |
| Illinois | 666 | 81.2% | 71.6% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 15.5% | 0.30% | 3.2% | 2.6 |
| Indiana | 507 | 56.4% | 81.9% | 0.00% | 14.79% | 3.6% | 0.00% | 1.0% | 3.1 |
| Kansas | 296 | 58.8% | 61.8% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.7% | 0.34% | 9.5% | 3.1 |
| Kentucky | 267 | 82.4% | 70.8% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 9.0% | 0.37% | 0.7% | 3.0 |
| Louisiana | 265 | 81.1% | 63.0% | 0.00% | 3.02% | 4.9% | 0.38% | 0.0% | 2.5 |
| Massachusetts | 341 | 73.0% | 66.0% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 12.0% | 2.35% | 5.3% | 3.0 |
| Maryland | 221 | 82.4% | 74.2% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 9.0% | 0.00% | 0.9% | 3.1 |
| Maine | 78 | 71.8% | 60.3% | 0.00% | 11.54% | 1.3% | 1.28% | 9.0% | 3.1 |
| Michigan | 422 | 76.5% | 73.2% | 0.47% | 0.95% | 5.2% | 1.66% | 0.2% | 3.1 |
| Minnesota | 338 | 30.2% | 57.4% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 3.0% | 0.00% | 12.1% | 3.2 |
| Missouri | 487 | 79.7% | 70.4% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 11.1% | 2.67% | 1.8% | 2.5 |
| Mississippi | 202 | 77.7% | 59.4% | 0.00% | 3.47% | 3.5% | 0.50% | 9.4% | 2.8 |
| Montana | 61 | 57.4% | 52.5% | 1.64% | 4.92% | 13.1% | 0.00% | 4.9% | 2.9 |
| North Carolina | 419 | 83.5% | 75.7% | 0.00% | 7.64% | 13.6% | 0.00% | 1.4% | 2.9 |
| North Dakota | 72 | 5.6% | 37.5% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 3.2 |
| Nebraska | 180 | 39.4% | 52.8% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.6% | 0.00% | 6.7% | 2.8 |
| New Hampshire | 73 | 61.6% | 45.2% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 12.3% | 1.37% | 6.8% | 3.1 |
| New Jersey | 348 | 82.5% | 69.0% | 0.00% | 3.16% | 5.5% | 0.00% | 2.9% | 3.3 |
| New Mexico | 68 | 85.3% | 70.6% | 0.00% | 4.41% | 19.1% | 2.94% | 4.4% | 2.9 |
| Nevada | 66 | 86.4% | 74.2% | 4.55% | 4.55% | 19.7% | 1.52% | 6.1% | 3.2 |
| New York | 593 | 69.8% | 51.1% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.8% | 0.00% | 8.3% | 3.0 |
| Ohio | 922 | 84.9% | 73.9% | 0.43% | 2.06% | 6.3% | 0.00% | 0.5% | 3.2 |
| Oklahoma | 283 | 89.4% | 53.0% | 0.00% | 1.06% | 8.5% | 0.00% | 3.5% | 2.7 |
| Oregon | 128 | 86.7% | 82.0% | 3.13% | 15.63% | 29.7% | 3.13% | 7.0% | 3.1 |
| Pennsylvania | 656 | 63.0% | 60.7% | 3.66% | 2.74% | 13.9% | 0.15% | 2.7% | 3.0 |
| Puerto Ricosmall | 9 | 55.6% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00% | 22.2% | 3.0 |
| Rhode Island | 72 | 84.7% | 47.2% | 0.00% | 4.17% | 9.7% | 0.00% | 1.4% | 2.9 |
| South Carolina | 187 | 79.7% | 69.5% | 0.53% | 5.35% | 9.6% | 0.00% | 0.5% | 3.0 |
| South Dakota | 96 | 32.3% | 51.0% | 6.25% | 1.04% | 6.3% | 0.00% | 13.5% | 2.9 |
| Tennessee | 303 | 81.8% | 73.9% | 0.00% | 4.95% | 13.5% | 0.66% | 1.7% | 3.0 |
| Texas | 1,177 | 70.9% | 79.6% | 0.00% | 12.23% | 16.3% | 2.04% | 1.6% | 2.7 |
| Utah | 97 | 68.0% | 81.4% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.2% | 2.06% | 6.2% | 3.3 |
| Virginia | 289 | 76.8% | 74.0% | 0.00% | 8.30% | 9.7% | 1.04% | 3.5% | 3.0 |
| Vermont | 33 | 66.7% | 48.5% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.0% | 0.00% | 24.2% | 2.9 |
| Washington | 193 | 79.3% | 72.5% | 5.70% | 5.18% | 21.8% | 0.00% | 5.2% | 3.2 |
| Wisconsin | 323 | 61.6% | 59.8% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 7.4% | 0.62% | 1.2% | 3.0 |
| West Virginia | 123 | 80.5% | 76.4% | 0.00% | 12.20% | 7.3% | 0.00% | 6.5% | 3.0 |
| Wyoming | 36 | 47.2% | 38.9% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 30.6% | 22.22% | 8.3% | 2.9 |
Quality and enforcement by disclosure group
Descriptive averages of the release columns for each disclosure group. They do not control for case mix, size, region or the reasons a facility changes hands, and the private-equity group is small (65 facilities). They describe; they do not explain.
All facilities
| Disclosure group | Facilities | Avg overall rating | Rated 1 or 2 stars | Avg staffing rating | Nurse hours / resident day | Nurse turnover | Any penalty | Avg fines | SFF or candidate | Abuse icon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No PE or REIT disclosure | 13,552 | 2.99 | 40.7% | 2.92 | 3.86 | 45.9% | 46.1% | $30,872 | 3.5% | 9.5% |
| PE or REIT among other disclosable parties only | 529 | 2.74 | 49.4% | 2.48 | 3.56 | 47.7% | 53.9% | $39,569 | 3.8% | 13.6% |
| No PECOS enrollment matched | 475 | 3.07 | 38.6% | 3.30 | 4.23 | 40.8% | 37.7% | $25,552 | 4.6% | 11.2% |
| Discloses a REIT owner | 69 | 3.22 | 32.4% | 3.07 | 3.94 | 46.6% | 42.0% | $27,750 | 2.9% | 4.4% |
| Discloses a private-equity owner | 65 | 2.30 | 66.7% | 2.83 | 3.84 | 48.8% | 63.1% | $52,110 | 12.3% | 20.0% |
For-profit facilities only
| Disclosure group | Facilities | Avg overall rating | Rated 1 or 2 stars | Avg staffing rating | Nurse hours / resident day | Nurse turnover | Any penalty | Avg fines | SFF or candidate | Abuse icon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No PE or REIT disclosure | 10,058 | 2.81 | 45.8% | 2.63 | 3.69 | 47.2% | 48.4% | $34,914 | 4.2% | 10.4% |
| PE or REIT among other disclosable parties only | 456 | 2.72 | 49.9% | 2.47 | 3.58 | 47.8% | 55.7% | $41,428 | 3.5% | 14.3% |
| No PECOS enrollment matched | 233 | 2.69 | 49.8% | 2.66 | 3.56 | 43.4% | 45.1% | $35,270 | 7.3% | 14.6% |
| Discloses a REIT owner | 65 | 3.19 | 34.4% | 3.10 | 3.93 | 47.1% | 43.1% | $29,124 | 3.1% | 4.6% |
| Discloses a private-equity owner | 65 | 2.30 | 66.7% | 2.83 | 3.84 | 48.8% | 63.1% | $52,110 | 12.3% | 20.0% |
The most-disclosed owners
Organizations as printed in the PECOS All Owners file, counted by the facilities that disclose them. CMS leaves the organization name blank on some rows; those are grouped as Name not published in the CMS file.
Private-equity companies in ownership or control roles
REITs in any role (owner or other party)
Changes of ownership
PECOS change-of-ownership records for certified nursing homes by effective year; the file is cut in the summer, so the latest year is partial. 1,399 facilities changed hands in the 36 months before the vintage (0 more than once). Care Compare's own twelve-month flag marks 113. The Care Compare ownership file is not a turnover measure: CMS relabelled its owner roles three times and the 2023 disclosure rule added new categories, so counts of "new owners" in that file mostly record reporting changes (methodology, section 9).
| Effective year | Changes of ownership |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 240 |
| 2017 | 341 |
| 2018 | 387 |
| 2019 | 547 |
| 2020 | 405 |
| 2021 | 573 |
| 2022 | 722 |
| 2023 | 873 |
| 2024 | 739 |
| 2025 | 395 |
| 2026 | 3 |
Where the federal files disagree
The discrepancy register lists every facility whose CMS files disagree with each other or leave a required ownership disclosure empty: 2,209 rows across six mechanical checks in release v2026.08. Each row is a statement about two federal files, never a finding about the facility.
475 facilities
No PECOS enrollment matched to the CCN. The facility is certified in Care Compare but no Skilled Nursing Facility enrollment in the PECOS files carries its CCN, so none of its ownership disclosures can be read.
1,437 facilities
PECOS enrollment lists no ownership-interest party. The facility's current PECOS enrollment names officers, directors, managing employees or other parties, but no direct, indirect or partnership ownership interest (role codes 34, 35, 38, 39, 85, 86). Non-profit and government facilities have no equity owners to list, so most of these rows are expected; the check matters for for-profit facilities.
293 facilities
Ownership-interest owners disclosed without any ownership percentage. Every ownership-interest row on the facility's current enrollment leaves the percentage blank, so the share each owner holds cannot be read from the file.
3 facilities
PE or REIT owner disclosed in PECOS, Care Compare lists individuals only. PECOS flags a private-equity company or a REIT in an ownership or control role, while the Care Compare ownership file for the same facility lists only individuals.
1 facilities
Ownership changed in the last 12 months per Care Compare, no PECOS change of ownership in 36 months. Care Compare flags an ownership change in the last twelve months, but the PECOS Change of Ownership file has no record for the facility in the 36 months before the vintage.
Sources and method
Every value on this page is a column of release v2026.08 (CMS August 2026 vintage; PECOS Skilled Nursing Facility All Owners, Enrollments and Change of Ownership files; the Nursing Home Chain Performance Measures file) or a count of its rows, computed by tcr-open-data ownership-study and committed as CSV in the public repository; the release is archived at Zenodo. The owner-versus-party rule (role codes 34, 35, 38, 39, 43, 85, 86 are owners; everything else is a party) and the disclosure groups are in section 11 of the methodology.
Cite as: The Care Ratings Open Nursing Home Data, release v2026.08, ownership study, https://thecareratings.com/data/ownership/ (built 16 September 2026). Prepared by the Care Ratings Team under the editorial standards; corrections go to the contact page.
Subscribe to our state of care updates
Get new articles, nursing home rating explainers, policy changes, and state-by-state care insights delivered to your inbox.









