
Staffing against the rescinded federal minimums
The federal minimum staffing rule was finalized in 2024 and rescinded effective February 2, 2026, before its hour floors took effect. In the August 2026 CMS files, 21.8% of nursing homes report hours at or above all three of its floors. This page tracks that share by state, ownership, star rating and size, month by month since 2019.
- 21.8% at or above all three floors
- RN 55.0% · aide 32.7% · total 64.0%
- 14,288 of 14,690 facilities report hours
- Release v2026.08
How to read this page
The three floors
0.55 registered-nurse, 2.45 nurse-aide and 3.48 total nurse hours per resident day: the numeric minimums of the federal rule finalized in May 2024 and rescinded by an interim final rule effective February 2, 2026.
Reported hours
Hours are the payroll-based hours per resident day that CMS publishes on Provider Information, averaged over a quarter. They are not adjusted for resident acuity. Facilities with no reported hours are left out of every share.
What is not tested
The rule also required a registered nurse on site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. That needs daily payroll data and is not tested here, so the true share that would have met the whole rule is lower than the all-three figure.
The brief
The floor that never took effect: nursing home staffing against the repealed federal minimums: the written reading of these tables, pinned to release v2026.08.
What states require
The minimum nursing staff each state and the District of Columbia set in statute or regulation, each checked against the legal text.
A description, not a verdict
A facility below a floor is not thereby found to be understaffed for its residents, and a facility above one is not thereby found to be adequately staffed. The shares describe a rule that never applied.
The headline numbers
- At or above all three floors21.8%3,110 of 14,288 facilities
- RN floor (0.55)55.0%average 0.69 RN hours per resident day
- Aide floor (2.45)32.7%average 2.32 aide hours per resident day
- Total floor (3.48)64.0%average 3.86 total nurse hours
- Weekend total hours3.42against 3.86 across the week
- Nurse turnover45.8%registered nurses 42.9%, annual
- Within a quarter hour of the total floor35.2%of facilities, either side of 3.48
- For-profit against non-profit13.0% vs 49.0%at or above all three floors
How far facilities sit from the total floor
Reported total nurse hours per resident day, less 3.48. 35.2% of facilities are within a quarter of an hour of the floor on one side or the other, so small changes in reported hours move the headline share.
By ownership, star rating and size
13.0% of for-profit facilities report hours at or above all three floors, against 49.0% of non-profit facilities. The share rises with the CMS overall star rating, from 8.8% of 1-star facilities to 43.2% of 5-star facilities; staffing is one of the three inputs to that rating, so the two are not independent. The disclosure groups are those of the ownership study. Comparisons are descriptive and control for nothing.
Ownership type
| Ownership type | Facilities with hours | RN floor | Aide floor | Total floor | All three | Avg total hours | Avg RN hours | Avg aide hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For profit | 10,643 | 48.5% | 24.6% | 57.9% | 13.0% | 3.69 | 0.61 | 2.21 |
| Non profit | 2,752 | 78.0% | 58.0% | 85.4% | 49.0% | 4.40 | 0.94 | 2.63 |
| Government | 893 | 61.7% | 51.7% | 70.3% | 42.2% | 4.28 | 0.83 | 2.63 |
CMS overall star rating
| CMS overall star rating | Facilities with hours | RN floor | Aide floor | Total floor | All three | Avg total hours | Avg RN hours | Avg aide hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 star | 2,875 | 35.6% | 20.6% | 43.8% | 8.8% | 3.48 | 0.51 | 2.13 |
| 2 stars | 2,885 | 48.5% | 25.3% | 56.7% | 13.9% | 3.68 | 0.60 | 2.22 |
| 3 stars | 2,751 | 53.5% | 30.4% | 63.2% | 18.4% | 3.80 | 0.64 | 2.30 |
| 4 stars | 2,727 | 60.1% | 35.3% | 71.2% | 24.1% | 3.94 | 0.71 | 2.36 |
| 5 stars | 2,951 | 76.8% | 51.6% | 84.7% | 43.2% | 4.40 | 0.97 | 2.57 |
Certified beds
| Certified beds | Facilities with hours | RN floor | Aide floor | Total floor | All three | Avg total hours | Avg RN hours | Avg aide hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 50 beds | 1,564 | 84.5% | 60.4% | 84.8% | 52.8% | 4.67 | 1.19 | 2.66 |
| 50 to 99 beds | 5,439 | 59.9% | 37.6% | 67.2% | 24.5% | 3.88 | 0.68 | 2.35 |
| 100 to 149 beds | 4,932 | 45.4% | 23.3% | 57.2% | 12.8% | 3.68 | 0.57 | 2.22 |
| 150 to 199 beds | 1,525 | 40.9% | 22.3% | 58.4% | 12.8% | 3.69 | 0.56 | 2.22 |
| 200 beds or more | 825 | 50.2% | 24.0% | 55.0% | 15.2% | 3.63 | 0.63 | 2.21 |
Chain status
| Chain status | Facilities with hours | RN floor | Aide floor | Total floor | All three | Avg total hours | Avg RN hours | Avg aide hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In a CMS-identified chain | 9,971 | 51.7% | 24.2% | 58.3% | 14.3% | 3.70 | 0.63 | 2.21 |
| Not in a chain | 4,317 | 62.5% | 52.4% | 77.2% | 38.9% | 4.24 | 0.81 | 2.57 |
PECOS disclosure group
| PECOS disclosure group | Facilities with hours | RN floor | Aide floor | Total floor | All three | Avg total hours | Avg RN hours | Avg aide hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No PE or REIT disclosure | 13,212 | 54.9% | 32.9% | 64.7% | 21.6% | 3.86 | 0.68 | 2.32 |
| PE or REIT among other disclosable parties only | 524 | 45.4% | 17.4% | 44.7% | 11.1% | 3.56 | 0.57 | 2.12 |
| No PECOS enrollment matched | 424 | 64.9% | 48.6% | 67.9% | 38.4% | 4.23 | 0.85 | 2.61 |
| Discloses a REIT owner | 67 | 68.7% | 31.3% | 61.2% | 29.9% | 3.94 | 0.82 | 2.28 |
| Discloses a private-equity owner | 61 | 68.9% | 23.0% | 62.3% | 14.8% | 3.84 | 0.72 | 2.30 |
By state
Pick a layer. State staffing requirements differ; they are in the table of state standards. The table under the map carries every layer for every state, with the change in the all-three share since the first monthly file of 2019.
At or above all three floors. Share of facilities reporting hours at or above the rescinded RN, aide and total floors together. CMS August 2026 vintage, release v2026.08. States with fewer than 10 facilities are left blank.
| Alabama | 221 | 33.5% | 74.2% | 66.5% | 50.2% | 3.88 | +14.1 pts |
| Alaska | 16 | 87.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 87.5% | 6.69 | -12.5 pts |
| Arizona | 136 | 19.9% | 67.6% | 59.6% | 26.5% | 3.97 | -12.3 pts |
| Arkansas | 218 | 10.6% | 85.3% | 15.6% | 62.4% | 4.03 | +6.7 pts |
| California | 1,128 | 33.4% | 98.1% | 42.2% | 78.7% | 4.52 | +10.2 pts |
| Colorado | 203 | 23.2% | 50.2% | 78.8% | 23.6% | 3.72 | -4.1 pts |
| Connecticut | 185 | 20.0% | 68.1% | 58.9% | 23.8% | 3.73 | -1.7 pts |
| Delaware | 43 | 20.9% | 100.0% | 86.0% | 20.9% | 4.35 | -8.0 pts |
| District of Columbia | 15 | 60.0% | 93.3% | 100.0% | 60.0% | 4.77 | -1.1 pts |
| Florida | 679 | 18.3% | 71.7% | 63.3% | 21.4% | 3.82 | -41.1 pts |
| Georgia | 343 | 8.5% | 45.8% | 35.0% | 19.5% | 3.56 | +4.8 pts |
| Guamsmall | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 7.72 | — |
| Hawaii | 41 | 70.7% | 97.6% | 100.0% | 70.7% | 4.97 | -3.0 pts |
| Idaho | 79 | 38.0% | 82.3% | 86.1% | 41.8% | 4.04 | -14.1 pts |
| Illinois | 652 | 17.2% | 37.1% | 57.4% | 20.4% | 3.45 | +1.0 pts |
| Indiana | 501 | 11.8% | 57.1% | 61.5% | 19.0% | 3.68 | +1.3 pts |
| Iowa | 379 | 38.5% | 66.0% | 73.6% | 49.1% | 3.82 | +9.6 pts |
| Kansas | 285 | 48.1% | 80.4% | 69.1% | 63.2% | 4.07 | +4.5 pts |
| Kentucky | 259 | 22.4% | 70.3% | 71.0% | 28.6% | 3.95 | +3.9 pts |
| Louisiana | 253 | 1.6% | 64.0% | 4.0% | 30.0% | 3.73 | -0.3 pts |
| Maine | 78 | 79.5% | 97.4% | 97.4% | 80.8% | 4.34 | -1.8 pts |
| Maryland | 218 | 12.8% | 63.8% | 78.9% | 12.8% | 3.87 | -9.2 pts |
| Massachusetts | 335 | 14.6% | 75.2% | 58.8% | 20.3% | 3.86 | -2.6 pts |
| Michigan | 415 | 23.9% | 77.1% | 71.8% | 26.7% | 3.99 | -9.9 pts |
| Minnesota | 328 | 53.0% | 82.3% | 95.4% | 53.7% | 4.19 | -0.6 pts |
| Mississippi | 196 | 26.0% | 83.7% | 53.1% | 38.8% | 4.18 | +5.9 pts |
| Missouri | 467 | 11.3% | 42.4% | 23.8% | 32.5% | 3.43 | -1.5 pts |
| Montana | 58 | 46.6% | 60.3% | 84.5% | 51.7% | 4.05 | +14.9 pts |
| Nebraska | 170 | 42.4% | 74.1% | 61.2% | 62.9% | 3.98 | -2.0 pts |
| Nevada | 63 | 30.2% | 71.4% | 74.6% | 30.2% | 4.30 | -6.8 pts |
| New Hampshire | 72 | 31.9% | 61.1% | 88.9% | 33.3% | 3.90 | -4.7 pts |
| New Jersey | 341 | 15.8% | 61.3% | 49.9% | 19.4% | 3.85 | +0.5 pts |
| New Mexico | 66 | 16.7% | 45.5% | 53.0% | 22.7% | 3.53 | +1.6 pts |
| New York | 582 | 14.1% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 17.7% | 3.62 | -5.2 pts |
| North Carolina | 404 | 15.8% | 55.0% | 43.1% | 26.7% | 3.83 | -0.3 pts |
| North Dakota | 70 | 77.1% | 88.6% | 95.7% | 80.0% | 4.42 | +8.7 pts |
| Ohio | 907 | 10.7% | 57.2% | 59.1% | 13.2% | 3.69 | -0.9 pts |
| Oklahoma | 259 | 5.0% | 68.0% | 8.5% | 52.1% | 3.79 | -1.9 pts |
| Oregon | 125 | 64.0% | 99.2% | 64.0% | 99.2% | 5.03 | -7.8 pts |
| Pennsylvania | 637 | 19.5% | 62.6% | 65.0% | 20.7% | 3.89 | +1.8 pts |
| Puerto Ricosmall | 8 | 0.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 3.80 | — |
| Rhode Island | 69 | 31.9% | 62.3% | 76.8% | 37.7% | 3.71 | -2.7 pts |
| South Carolina | 184 | 18.5% | 54.3% | 44.6% | 23.9% | 3.83 | -4.0 pts |
| South Dakota | 91 | 39.6% | 62.6% | 81.3% | 44.0% | 3.79 | +8.8 pts |
| Tennessee | 302 | 7.6% | 66.2% | 47.7% | 15.6% | 3.80 | +0.2 pts |
| Texas | 1,141 | 4.9% | 28.7% | 19.2% | 9.6% | 3.39 | -0.2 pts |
| Utah | 90 | 30.0% | 71.1% | 96.7% | 30.0% | 4.07 | -13.4 pts |
| Vermont | 31 | 51.6% | 100.0% | 83.9% | 61.3% | 4.22 | +20.2 pts |
| Virginia | 283 | 13.8% | 47.3% | 47.7% | 16.3% | 3.76 | -1.3 pts |
| Washington | 188 | 51.1% | 96.3% | 93.6% | 54.8% | 4.37 | +11.5 pts |
| West Virginia | 121 | 12.4% | 49.6% | 72.7% | 15.7% | 3.66 | +3.2 pts |
| Wisconsin | 317 | 47.6% | 84.2% | 93.7% | 48.9% | 4.21 | +1.7 pts |
| Wyoming | 35 | 37.1% | 62.9% | 82.9% | 40.0% | 3.87 | +0.7 pts |
Since 2019
The share at or above all three floors was 23.0% in the 17 January 2019 file, peaked at 28.9% in the 9 October 2020 file, when resident counts fell during the pandemic and hours per resident rose, reached a low of 18.0% in the 26 April 2023 file and stands at 21.8% in the 26 August 2026 file. The series shows no step at the finalization of the rule or at its rescission. Under the phase-in CMS published, the total-hours floor was due two years after publication and the RN and aide floors three years after, later for rural facilities, so no hour floor was in force when the rule was rescinded.
Each floor on its own
All three floors by ownership type, first file of each year
| Ownership type | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For profit | 14.4% | 14.8% | 18.6% | 12.8% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 12.0% | 13.7% |
| Non profit | 44.6% | 43.6% | 49.4% | 38.9% | 38.8% | 41.1% | 47.4% | 50.0% |
| Government | 39.1% | 40.4% | 43.3% | 38.9% | 37.6% | 39.3% | 41.5% | 42.6% |
Sources and method
Every value is a column of release v2026.08 (CMS August 2026 Provider Information) or, for the history, of the monthly CMS archive snapshots since January 2019, computed by tcr-open-data staffing-study and committed as CSV in the public repository; the release is archived at Zenodo. Section 13 of the methodology defines the floors, the hours and each table. The approach of comparing reported hours with the rule's floors follows KFF's 2024 analysis.
Cite as: The Care Ratings Open Nursing Home Data, release v2026.08, staffing-standards study, https://thecareratings.com/data/staffing/ (built 17 September 2026). Prepared by the Care Ratings Team under the editorial standards; corrections go to the contact page.
Subscribe to our state of care updates
Get new articles, nursing home rating explainers, policy changes, and state-by-state care insights delivered to your inbox.









